diff options
| author | Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com> | 2015-08-17 20:16:04 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-17 19:16:26 +0000 |
| commit | 0d8c8a4fd82e1c65fd880e9b9fbcb06cc53a6987 (patch) | |
| tree | 29d4b243ab93ec9739e3a235f89cdd84a0c8799d | |
| parent | 45943eee8a09d6f58bab0574116c4ec24c455db3 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-0d8c8a4fd82e1c65fd880e9b9fbcb06cc53a6987.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-0d8c8a4fd82e1c65fd880e9b9fbcb06cc53a6987.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
| -rw-r--r-- | b7/ed7207dea9de034c4078086754ee3225520d43 | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b7/ed7207dea9de034c4078086754ee3225520d43 b/b7/ed7207dea9de034c4078086754ee3225520d43 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2ea9b2b61 --- /dev/null +++ b/b7/ed7207dea9de034c4078086754ee3225520d43 @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +Return-Path: <hectorchu@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB9B3EE + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:26 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com + [209.85.215.54]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C40211 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:25 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so85438100lal.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=/cN3MiY6Un86a01x/EfmNt/62FqwH+OIetefCIfQlN8=; + b=gZC76a94FIMEhhSYZRj49ey95AyOWGIADCEsmhjcc6ODwa9UMd9aqF+gV7L7M5w32v + 7st7stZr9XnLA2McJCGGniQ5o9RxzRGB6MIctwjoebrEtuvVlDXHuUKYbcWOGVKV2IuH + k/XC7ttIzbGyE9bvuFqExqcsNelsSIw63U4Rvtfq1YlTBgtRQeC0D2icnSI1qi4bXpgK + TEN9sFt4v8ZCcWqeTN2FdXL+5OgWt2PsRnSIXB+8vlV1Uzv62/spTKXoFN98gLDGHvPa + VDWBsUTIskKwy+C35AmYE2lD25yewvKOHqlqush+tN6SxIITX158xlJzA8qswxcuy2BZ + 0eFA== +X-Received: by 10.112.17.70 with SMTP id m6mr2348695lbd.113.1439838984228; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.25.22.25 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04> +References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04> +From: Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com> +Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:16:04 +0100 +Message-ID: <CAAO2FKF85Q-SoTEeVrYLEh-ZiEsGoMe1zzbDVdZy3FLbwU5yQg@mail.gmail.com> +To: satoshi@vistomail.com +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:26 -0000 + +--001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On 15 August 2015 at 18:43, Satoshi Nakamoto via bitcoin-dev < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of +> relying solely on altruism. +> + +Is he talking about "full nodes" i.e. validating-only, or nodes in the +sense of the original whitepaper (i.e. miners)? Because there is already +plenty of incentive for running a node (i.e. the coinbase). + +The issue is that the reward is more or less like a decentralised lottery +with high entry cost. If the income could be smoothed like in a mining +pool, without actually being a mining pool, then perhaps more people would +pay to enter the mining game. A bit like making P2Pool the one and only +pool allowed on the network. + +--001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 1= +5 August 2015 at 18:43, Satoshi Nakamoto via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">= +<<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla= +nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockqu= +ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s= +olid;padding-left:1ex">I suspect we need a better incentive for users to ru= +n nodes instead of relying solely on altruism.<br></blockquote><div><br></d= +iv><div>Is he talking about "full nodes" i.e. validating-only, or= + nodes in the sense of the original whitepaper (i.e. miners)? Because there= + is already plenty of incentive for running a node (i.e. the coinbase).</di= +v><div><br></div><div>The issue is that the reward is more or less like a d= +ecentralised lottery with high entry cost. If the income could be smoothed = +like in a mining pool, without actually being a mining pool, then perhaps m= +ore people would pay to enter the mining game. A bit like making P2Pool the= + one and only pool allowed on the network.</div></div></div></div> + +--001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387-- + |