summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>2017-05-09 19:30:52 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2017-05-09 19:30:54 +0000
commit0b7b6d501e3ab8aca8afb35d690c5c984a159412 (patch)
tree7c2ba10635be9c1967af418e85dd24c421ffb472
parentb59eaef8dfdd9dc76fa6a9746b67ef3299e2d652 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-0b7b6d501e3ab8aca8afb35d690c5c984a159412.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-0b7b6d501e3ab8aca8afb35d690c5c984a159412.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit Discount
-rw-r--r--c3/8af83373f18d10d2147c9160715b40cbc753d092
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c3/8af83373f18d10d2147c9160715b40cbc753d0 b/c3/8af83373f18d10d2147c9160715b40cbc753d0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..92d71e16e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c3/8af83373f18d10d2147c9160715b40cbc753d0
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56BBB7E
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 9 May 2017 19:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-ua0-f174.google.com (mail-ua0-f174.google.com
+ [209.85.217.174])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A755154
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 9 May 2017 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-ua0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g49so11999195uaa.1
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Tue, 09 May 2017 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
+ h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
+ :subject:to:cc;
+ bh=j/VXnG8hB1nYux1WQZfkuP1+W5tpGZ2okr2eb4d+2ig=;
+ b=IhFza7tDRm3UXe8Hz6hd3bb6hpVxoJJbMuKq3N7w6TKz84StrX7ntl/3FGjQSiHn6x
+ 9H26g3rayBq5L7zTeZzVK046Lor5JyZ8+HUVXo0Os1j91Lcp1FARV7EMmimpmEHpk6rg
+ 0Dukm6z5aSJMPPfl2zGdLrxaDlgJ8yCHUwT8WEoSUv61RMzLWe6AAVVfSxgv7lB7Vf6s
+ IzpBd062hirx5AJ6zxu5IdfpMikKGmbnsqTFTN5yDrHPju6NvU8vy/FChnmXqAFbNsue
+ QC5ZqdIAQUeNw74W6X4MCutfurmp/8Hp7SS0pnbj1o6w9Ee9Q4TbSbuhr5lAp7spzwXt
+ KkTQ==
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
+ :date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
+ bh=j/VXnG8hB1nYux1WQZfkuP1+W5tpGZ2okr2eb4d+2ig=;
+ b=QrA5ZWZ1j69+iXWqBZFtFfzSTLK9Pyit6qWaOwBHRXGABMSUle6anZc1ob4QIeetTK
+ 2bFVr1vfg5ZIc3GKSTCT6oaHOm4F6E5OJoPlSbXJzUUFWnR0UmzKQm6kmaP8qegr3Slj
+ SiSdCMvGCcjiRyuwCbpRYFY5yNX00RIc/3cuOrfg5yZlw0hYdCs+WXbY/U8mhRwZL4P1
+ vdVSd0KE4jt7RheZUT9D5vG0jhaL53NPishL7JLHrLZOB4RIaSMlrQmplprgJmetQ2xj
+ H6iw9ZaFSI4BRMV266OMapp0xGxH433JACAHKX1FaxDMCTsaeGmJ792HTtkL/lVrB52N
+ 4Jgg==
+X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCVc2f3V0Szwwl5SijpkgrvXaA784mDT8DmGxu29LtLzaNc6tCM
+ 0TeqNgPOkunj5SKNlPMY+1vxlwRmRA==
+X-Received: by 10.31.236.197 with SMTP id k188mr806823vkh.26.1494358252676;
+ Tue, 09 May 2017 12:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
+Received: by 10.103.20.66 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2017 12:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAKzdR-pN0B-wjhPh3n6Jw7L6wsz9yQ=kyVX7NYx5ACZC3bg8OA@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAKzdR-qojNn8OtUTPbxa0JauK9nmo2ZGm4ihKuyzsz_FAgokDw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAMBsKS_j7Lso6fHoMPkrQ7UFwKfxOERAAqL=aUF83O4CqL+iFg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAKzdR-on-w9EF+2hLjchdyHB1gj7fi4QnybA=J4Cz7yyN3KKNA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <e86d9b29-f7dd-75da-e6c6-f55648bea104@mattcorallo.com>
+ <CAKzdR-pyE2f0jdsU+QGbJQ9gMepsyS880kntE9MRvDBLG_Nchg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAKzdR-pN0B-wjhPh3n6Jw7L6wsz9yQ=kyVX7NYx5ACZC3bg8OA@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
+Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 19:30:52 +0000
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: ztgyPwbUYLq5EZeBlJYUmJ-eS2g
+Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQsT7c+CEfC+U9N+g-+V4s8WnQjRqDddfCKMb6+BkJ3-A@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit
+ Discount
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 19:30:55 -0000
+
+On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev
+<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+> The capacity of Segwit(50%)+2MbHF is 50% more than Segwit, and the maximum
+> block size is the same.
+
+And the UTXO bloat potential is twice as large and the cost of that
+UTXO bloat is significantly reduced. So you're basically gutting the
+most of the gain from weight, making something incompatible, etc.
+
+I'm not sure what to explain-- even that page on segwit.org explains
+that the values are selected to balance worst case costs not to
+optimize one to the total exclusion of others. Raw size is not very
+relevant in the long run, but if your goal were to optimize for it
+(which it seems to be), then the limit should be pure size.
+