diff options
| author | Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> | 2013-10-25 13:05:04 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2013-10-25 20:05:12 +0000 |
| commit | 09f930cb6c89542e9bc87a30496707a119d63219 (patch) | |
| tree | 3a99508c896edeefd570f67369d984a232df2e9b | |
| parent | 2c52127acf53fe1e52dc9a7d95c1e78f963f129a (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-09f930cb6c89542e9bc87a30496707a119d63219.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-09f930cb6c89542e9bc87a30496707a119d63219.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 38
| -rw-r--r-- | 5e/c2fc037e7b40c2238aa820f495f6c1b0809bbb | 108 |
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/5e/c2fc037e7b40c2238aa820f495f6c1b0809bbb b/5e/c2fc037e7b40c2238aa820f495f6c1b0809bbb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..516d88d3b --- /dev/null +++ b/5e/c2fc037e7b40c2238aa820f495f6c1b0809bbb @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1VZndA-0005iX-5y + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:05:12 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.215.50; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; + helo=mail-la0-f50.google.com; +Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1VZnd8-0008As-Vo + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:05:12 +0000 +Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ec20so3483014lab.37 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:05:04 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.112.125.33 with SMTP id mn1mr3312224lbb.8.1382731504187; + Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:05:04 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.112.89.72 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:05:04 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <B09A5DE3EF411243BB3328232CD25A5D998989775B@MAILR023.mail.lan> +References: <B09A5DE3EF411243BB3328232CD25A5D998989775B@MAILR023.mail.lan> +Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:05:04 -0700 +Message-ID: <CAAS2fgR0zH6JZWm-qLR3HcTC_m5o4N7V4wnGMM01q4yiS4CDwQ@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +To: Mike Caldwell <mcaldwell@swipeclock.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. + See + http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block + for more information. [URIs: swipeclock.com] +X-Headers-End: 1VZnd8-0008As-Vo +Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" + <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 38 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:05:12 -0000 + +On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Mike Caldwell +<mcaldwell@swipeclock.com> wrote: +> I have noticed that there was a recent change to BIP 0038 +> (Password-Protected Private Key) on the Wiki, which is a proposal I wrote= + in +> late 2012. Gregory, it looks to me as though you have made this change, = +and +> I=E2=80=99m hoping for your help here. The change suggests that the numb= +er was +> never assigned, and that there has been no discussion regarding the propo= +sal +> on this list. + +Greetings, (repeating from our discussion on IRC) + +No prior messages about your proposal have made it to the list, and no +mention of the assignment had been made in the wiki. + +The first I ever heard of this scheme was long after you'd written the +document when I attempted to assign the number to something else then +noticed something existed at that name. + +Since you had previously created BIP documents without public +discussion (e.g. "BIP 22" +https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_CHECKSIGEX_DRAFT_BIP [...] Or, I wonder +did your emails just get eaten that time too?), I'd just assumed +something similar had happened here. + +I didn't take any action at the time I first noticed it, but after +someone complained about bitcoin-qt "not confirming with BIP38" to me +today it was clear to me that people were confusing this with +something that was "officially" (as much as anything is) supported, so +I moved the document out. (I've since moved it back, having heard +from you that you thought that it had actually been +assigned/announced). + +With respect to moving it forward: Having a wallet which can only a +single address is poor form. Jean-Paul Kogelman has a draft proposal +which is based on your BIP38 work though the encoding scheme is +different, having been revised in response to public discussion. + +Perhaps efforts here can be combined? + + |