diff options
| author | Adam Ritter <aritter@gmail.com> | 2015-08-30 08:38:29 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-30 06:38:31 +0000 |
| commit | 07d5ff7eef8d96fc777f377a9f7da84221fc413b (patch) | |
| tree | 138b2d05bed5cf5cdc4827721e0f6db41f237997 | |
| parent | 9d9511147a5b9776dcf4eb36a0364f8b26e90dd1 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-07d5ff7eef8d96fc777f377a9f7da84221fc413b.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-07d5ff7eef8d96fc777f377a9f7da84221fc413b.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Your Gmaxwell exchange
| -rw-r--r-- | b8/9c289bf77388987fa0940ec9d96371d35f246b | 74 |
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b8/9c289bf77388987fa0940ec9d96371d35f246b b/b8/9c289bf77388987fa0940ec9d96371d35f246b new file mode 100644 index 000000000..557fa3d05 --- /dev/null +++ b/b8/9c289bf77388987fa0940ec9d96371d35f246b @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +Return-Path: <aritter@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A882F93 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:38:31 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com + [209.85.212.171]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17C9A163 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:38:31 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so48113538wic.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=uUuEXnhC4bvIq/S+udT2DzTnW3UopfywBBIDLAODzoo=; + b=ZfhItpJe0xPbIWrBTLpGY4gwJ5qwYKb8pENMDfvBaH2qn2micA8phbiHcQY6pGPBKu + K/6h4uCJTsJprpc8sDETGcgOGAY/N/JP/CAyQUEqBykz7taUAP3VV1haQzJFaZEoKmt5 + bDwAvXDOl8dhCgqwOz2k9JJDq+3ANz7ysz8Z+5vy/Gp36i5fpuYXd6WNYdVVLzsruFw+ + i5EI6aW0tOaF3FhvF6/Fw34fE9gdXt98Ff9ZRGyVDNH808bfafbxothBOVmOIBzjOv5f + l4BGvv62y6z5IHBuHUNeTlCnkQ9wxUCDGw3crjB5ULe4+VoiaQOkst/K+yBrHT4BNCNg + HQ1w== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.194.190.110 with SMTP id gp14mr21978267wjc.76.1440916709413; + Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.28.13.5 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgShF=2vtPrKtXmdA454s_xpJbxSB0SFBsstniHB8WtGzQ@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAEgR2PFB3h_8fr=d8HegRSD0XdooimhFKtLR4vKr2QXv+EwBfQ@mail.gmail.com> + <AD284610-4F40-445C-A074-CC94EDFFCBA8@gmx.com> + <CAAS2fgRs5NVM2nHKNXbgMJa51tDq-6ZBc6XfaScyP45UPWTW_g@mail.gmail.com> + <5CC48639-11D0-4682-BF82-443286C8E58D@gmx.com> + <CAAS2fgShF=2vtPrKtXmdA454s_xpJbxSB0SFBsstniHB8WtGzQ@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:38:29 +0200 +Message-ID: <CAKuKjyUpJOMdDCjGmo1tYc6sA3r69VAXpvzhMJ7EZSHtb9C9Sw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Adam Ritter <aritter@gmail.com> +To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Dev" + <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Your Gmaxwell exchange +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:38:31 -0000 + +I don't really see any problem with the paper: +All it states is that having the assumption that miners don't +centralize, transaction fees don't go to zero even without the +blocksize limit. I think we can accept this as a nice academic +research, and I believe that it's true. +Still, it doesn't have anything that is practical for me as an user of +the Bitcoin network (I use it for storing long-term purchase value, as +most of the people who I know): it doesn't help me if I still need to +pay transaction fees after the blocksize limit is gone. My (and other +users') main concern is about centralization, which has nothing to do +with transaction fees. I would be OK with $100 transaction fee as +well, as long as the network is fair and secure (which comes from +decentralization). + |