diff options
| author | Jacob Eliosoff <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com> | 2017-07-12 03:27:32 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-07-12 07:27:36 +0000 |
| commit | 04664b743ecf40f1f51ca31ed85c8836a4ee1696 (patch) | |
| tree | fc0ba7eb4d495d5398257c3de33171398bc8372e | |
| parent | 19e78c7c9128fc3f44b568e13c3c12320f96dc9f (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-04664b743ecf40f1f51ca31ed85c8836a4ee1696.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-04664b743ecf40f1f51ca31ed85c8836a4ee1696.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Updating the Scaling Roadmap
| -rw-r--r-- | 9a/abfc6f5be18e0722dcca37f032748a7a120942 | 172 |
1 files changed, 172 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/9a/abfc6f5be18e0722dcca37f032748a7a120942 b/9a/abfc6f5be18e0722dcca37f032748a7a120942 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..90e5d7ae8 --- /dev/null +++ b/9a/abfc6f5be18e0722dcca37f032748a7a120942 @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ +Return-Path: <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340D4ACD + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:27:36 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com + [209.85.215.51]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496A486 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:27:35 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z78so8378343lff.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:27:35 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=nCVfpZPTaUVVGFVUgaVw4IXTUOYrQKKy3GLSPSYJHCY=; + b=f+cUFHa+xFQgFd5l0pDEoxvNiCXpE0Q+aHMFjFSubY1kYYy3QSmEw2cHs3N0YIpUOu + zUrWnkHW+/WXEBx+vgCGuDyjtRnHFSQ9jafnB3qdnmCEC3A9l44w8VZhvP0iXkv1zNS3 + BL9hmfnZu7yr1dUezLjZL6KORr2xGYyDIKozBOSIOCAAA6pBc0BI19AnLtx+1S6Bbm4A + XbkfvPp6Yo+z2gLe6jxgG+3942yS0SHhz/TlDr453pajtKwrjhv1tL2gZGb8oGJrAc9l + JWxpkAwlV4P9s8dk4vGyLDxZnQZCHfOq8G/T6uZi3r1pHTR8Z83p212Xw14wZU8pQ540 + Ekpg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=nCVfpZPTaUVVGFVUgaVw4IXTUOYrQKKy3GLSPSYJHCY=; + b=fogyv9htkJfptrt5DxfysuD36G9dSNsMp/FaUV2KaMFmwGn3ZKHg0y+sa9p3e5AJNN + p7WtN+FNxq0JUqeGe/gvZWfRT4XEWG6crkznfXcMJOKhZSUEOu5bSf7PE7rR4c38csVN + HcUWXN48o79jV4nU3XSdcaf5c5kINFVg4JWEYstLbkCEUO0gausX0RQ2m25ezJPktiYG + xrE5lUdcl5WyFaqdf2vZ3EcxqTObuW00AmiJlgyOxsOFLoUGtBXigbOQG3oOTs8yU77Y + z8d3/5+99w8wzfUqpQ61fMMpAfOFYirkonVaVnPrvN5j7cosWB8zyWqghrt/io9+FBBn + mlnQ== +X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1123BCng6MBlyj+BOyULTV+QGeMxFkN/e2IHVi0R0n3BnK67/n7s + wMwIYk4wv/QV4eCsL1+8b2743axXlg== +X-Received: by 10.46.14.18 with SMTP id 18mr1229006ljo.41.1499844453557; Wed, + 12 Jul 2017 00:27:33 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.25.29.139 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:27:32 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <a9ad2dd0-a949-643f-9375-a95015020066@gmail.com> +References: <0119661e-a11a-6d4b-c9ec-fd510bd4f144@gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgRDVgdMYZo776iLwbm23aGNDWL85YgD=yF=M-0_vqJ5nQ@mail.gmail.com> + <1c1d06a9-2e9f-5b2d-42b7-d908ada4b09e@gmail.com> + <A030CDEA-CB0F-40BF-9404-6BD091537BE1@taoeffect.com> + <08078429-089f-9315-2f76-a08121c5378c@gmail.com> + <D30D8852-EFF4-4AB3-9B97-53D622A1440A@taoeffect.com> + <a9ad2dd0-a949-643f-9375-a95015020066@gmail.com> +From: Jacob Eliosoff <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:27:32 -0400 +Message-ID: <CAAUaCyhdOJ3BxLd6QCqx19PxGDw5qM1YF5poZV8Jkp+RrmcR7A@mail.gmail.com> +To: Paul Sztorc <truthcoin@gmail.com>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, + RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:27:32 +0000 +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Updating the Scaling Roadmap +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:27:36 -0000 + +--f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +Just a quick note in favor of an updated roadmap (some may object to that +label, but I think it's fine). When you and your friends are planning your +weekly movie outing, it's very helpful to have someone who knows the group, +knows what films are playing, checks people's preferences, mails around +proposals, updates with corrections, keeps a list of choices for future +weeks, etc. (Certainly not the same as imposing an agenda, except when the +coordinator gets pushy.) + +Core veterans like those on this thread are well placed to compile (not +decree) such a document - basically an informed view of what looks likely +to get rough consensus, and in what order. *Of course* some will dispute +the priorities etc, but it's my experience that if everyone virtuously +refrains from this kind of coordination effort, often the weekend rolls by +without a film. + +Agreed that specific deadlines often create more problems than they solve, +but even without dates, clarifying priorities (eg, segwit before HF) is +still useful. + +All this is aside from the fact that I have many criticisms of the "movies +chosen" so far and the criteria used to choose them - another thread +(basically, I support an interpretation of "consensus" that takes more note +of non-dev constituents). The consensus-marshaling effort is still +important, and appreciated. + + +On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> And please try to avoid going off-topic -- this is supposed to be about +> the idea of a new roadmap. +> +> Paul +> +> _______________________________________________ +> bitcoin-dev mailing list +> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev +> + +--f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr">Just a quick note in favor of an updated roadmap (some may= + object to that label, but I think it's fine).=C2=A0 When you and your = +friends are planning your weekly movie outing, it's very helpful to hav= +e someone who knows the group, knows what films are playing, checks people&= +#39;s preferences, mails around proposals, updates with corrections, keeps = +a list of choices for future weeks, etc. =C2=A0(Certainly not the same as i= +mposing an agenda, except when the coordinator gets pushy.)<div><br></div><= +div>Core veterans like those on this thread are well placed to compile (not= + decree) such a document - basically an informed view of what looks likely = +to get rough consensus, and in what order. =C2=A0<i>Of course</i> some will= + dispute the priorities etc, but it's my experience that if everyone vi= +rtuously refrains from this kind of coordination effort, often the weekend = +rolls by without a film.</div><div><br></div><div>Agreed that specific dead= +lines often create more problems than they solve, but even without dates, c= +larifying priorities (eg, segwit before HF) is still useful.</div><div><br>= +</div><div><div><div>All this is aside from the fact that I have many criti= +cisms of the "movies chosen" so far and the criteria used to choo= +se them - another thread (basically, I support an interpretation of "c= +onsensus" that takes more note of non-dev constituents).=C2=A0 The con= +sensus-marshaling effort is still important, and appreciated.</div></div></= +div><div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote= +">On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D= +"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target= +=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>= +<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= +x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> + =20 + =20 + =20 + <div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><span class=3D""> + <div class=3D"m_5553629037657181519moz-cite-prefix">And please try to a= +void going off-topic -- this is supposed to be + about the idea of a new roadmap.<br></div></span><span class=3D"HOEnZb"= +><font color=3D"#888888"> + <br> + Paul + </font></span></div> + +<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> +bitcoin-dev mailing list<br> +<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.= +<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br> +<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" = +rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org= +/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></di= +v> + +--f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe-- + |