diff options
| author | Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> | 2015-08-24 01:01:26 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-24 01:01:27 +0000 |
| commit | 0232010ebcc9cb1a2ed3b3bf109de929c94e5108 (patch) | |
| tree | 994d8a5b949d12bd69263f5750d5796dd7851b6f | |
| parent | 38cbbbbbc048ae557bb41aa5bcb73df3e4c45cc3 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-0232010ebcc9cb1a2ed3b3bf109de929c94e5108.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-0232010ebcc9cb1a2ed3b3bf109de929c94e5108.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for relative locktime
| -rw-r--r-- | b6/ca0fb8c1b90441293603f36aa67ca327463489 | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b6/ca0fb8c1b90441293603f36aa67ca327463489 b/b6/ca0fb8c1b90441293603f36aa67ca327463489 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..746faef02 --- /dev/null +++ b/b6/ca0fb8c1b90441293603f36aa67ca327463489 @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF939C + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 24 Aug 2015 01:01:27 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com + [209.85.223.176]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9FFA115 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 24 Aug 2015 01:01:26 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by iodt126 with SMTP id t126so132627911iod.2 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:01:26 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=KWNvPZ8gkpOhm1sLeKx7gpFg+Sg8WcGDDp3Qu0gVxh8=; + b=HnthXVnyP72RbkNbJWuvBwZWCv0gQUKj7bv+1W8z0Hs7wdkcFypMZiqF/kE0Y1fnrJ + Z/X7sx18NrpNuLqHHNtJJFeC4YvNY+0Vj44MfR5MUKvVkwq4TXGuLF9oo0fJf3pfqcKH + yhoCaqrdU+VHcRB253bSecM1HTB88Tf6APv6UGGiek5Rylma1obZs08zDhXU1gS3JLEl + 2nODI/jgmY+oJl/AdThd9Ch4WizCu8J+t9ZOeGVeKDtXQ/bcHqLun/uh3JBRNMALT78x + xtVM5kT9/PSHUmwx3nNmWWrvUQZkmugizF+F/Ptw03Su7l9AvzMgytG1SKC17xnJVZIJ + ftHw== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.107.132.146 with SMTP id o18mr16451291ioi.134.1440378086285; + Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:01:26 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.107.14.136 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:01:26 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <55DA6470.9040301@thinlink.com> +References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com> + <CADJgMzv8G3EqLBwEYRHJZ+fO_Jwzy0koi2pJ_iNRkXmoVarGcg@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDod9z6ksgaCv86qFCyKLTQSL3+oNns+__5H77hVhs05DQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com> + <55DA6470.9040301@thinlink.com> +Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 01:01:26 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQKQpHu-nC1uSrigDx2JLUt64p-LqidVmiuULDE0MJCFQ@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +To: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for + relative locktime +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 01:01:27 -0000 + +On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev +<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> ack no inversion. This can actually allow more direct preservation of +> existing semantics. +> +> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009350.html + +I can't follow this logic. Can you help? The existing semantics, to +the extent that they exist at all is that the earliest version starts +with the lowest sequence number then counts up (and if it makes its +way to the highest number, the result is final-- because it could go +no higher). + +Thats the semantics 'the inversion' accomplishes for CSV: the that the +first version of a transaction begins with a smaller number which +successful versions increase, and the highest possible number is final +(no delay, because no delay is the shortest delay). + + +Seperately, to Mark and Btcdrank: Adding an extra wrinkel to the +discussion has any thought been given to represent one block with more +than one increment? This would leave additional space for future +signaling, or allow, for example, higher resolution numbers for a +sharechain commitement. + |