diff options
| author | bgroff <bgroff@lavabit.com> | 2011-06-22 12:01:47 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-06-22 16:01:53 +0000 |
| commit | 4d88e6c40e33f950f9ee9556661af36365e945fa (patch) | |
| tree | 2b5592e59cbbf95b7698e814b3b39c3673f229da /67 | |
| parent | 09e19b76c354c6c7d36bb9c0e8927e853d900083 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-4d88e6c40e33f950f9ee9556661af36365e945fa.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-4d88e6c40e33f950f9ee9556661af36365e945fa.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] [PULL] Add scriptPubKey enforced sendescrow and redeemescrow API calls
Diffstat (limited to '67')
| -rw-r--r-- | 67/be8165392817d270526a1b235b7b2c5b1e136b | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/67/be8165392817d270526a1b235b7b2c5b1e136b b/67/be8165392817d270526a1b235b7b2c5b1e136b new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ba426681a --- /dev/null +++ b/67/be8165392817d270526a1b235b7b2c5b1e136b @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <bgroff@lavabit.com>) id 1QZPsH-0002u7-N0 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:01:53 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of lavabit.com + designates 72.249.41.33 as permitted sender) + client-ip=72.249.41.33; envelope-from=bgroff@lavabit.com; + helo=karen.lavabit.com; +Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + id 1QZPsG-00051E-Rs for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:01:53 +0000 +Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10]) + by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5514C11BB60; + Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:01:47 -0500 (CDT) +Received: from lavabit.com (pppoe-212.28.72.39.araxinfo.com [212.28.72.39]) + by lavabit.com with ESMTP id 6TY50CCQGI3I; + Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:01:47 -0500 +Received: from 212.28.72.39 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bgroff) + by lavabit.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:01:47 -0400 (EDT) +Message-ID: <26145.212.28.72.39.1308758507.squirrel@lavabit.com> +In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin112Lriqg7cMo3P3WnFvVrcYPEK1d_T5x8Xcgf_gTc8Q@mail.gmail.com> +References: <18440.87.106.138.84.1308200020.squirrel@lavabit.com> + <BANLkTi=FTLnU-riNVYssnR9FLdcEeZX7gOS6Zdv1f_XDcJoSSg@mail.gmail.com> + <BANLkTin112Lriqg7cMo3P3WnFvVrcYPEK1d_T5x8Xcgf_gTc8Q@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:01:47 -0400 (EDT) +From: bgroff@lavabit.com +To: "Mike Hearn" <mike@plan99.net> +User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid +X-Headers-End: 1QZPsG-00051E-Rs +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [PULL] Add scriptPubKey enforced + sendescrow and redeemescrow API calls +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:01:53 -0000 + +> Oh, one other thing - as you point out yourself, escrow is only one use +> case +> for multsig transactions. So I suggest you don't use the word in the +> patch. +> Maybe instead call them multisign or multipay transactions. + + +Agreed. I'll rename to multisign. + +-- +Bobby Groff + + + + |