diff options
| author | Odinn Cyberguerrilla <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> | 2014-01-15 17:16:14 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-01-16 01:16:23 +0000 |
| commit | 0becf8fef827591ff0a5ae22b8c370c8b519ab88 (patch) | |
| tree | 9d2eafb90ae320882f34b75b8c3abd0ce352a1af /67/256ce5116d939ff055ee87fc2d05a2bd67b1dd | |
| parent | e0813a755252db5463b7972a737f698050e07a66 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-0becf8fef827591ff0a5ae22b8c370c8b519ab88.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-0becf8fef827591ff0a5ae22b8c370c8b519ab88.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses
Diffstat (limited to '67/256ce5116d939ff055ee87fc2d05a2bd67b1dd')
| -rw-r--r-- | 67/256ce5116d939ff055ee87fc2d05a2bd67b1dd | 150 |
1 files changed, 150 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/67/256ce5116d939ff055ee87fc2d05a2bd67b1dd b/67/256ce5116d939ff055ee87fc2d05a2bd67b1dd new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1ccd04980 --- /dev/null +++ b/67/256ce5116d939ff055ee87fc2d05a2bd67b1dd @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>) id 1W3bZH-00072B-Uv + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:16:23 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net + designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) + client-ip=198.252.153.129; + envelope-from=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net; + helo=mx1.riseup.net; +Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) + (Exim 4.76) id 1W3bZF-0002Ij-OQ + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:16:23 +0000 +Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (Client CN "*.riseup.net", + Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified)) + by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30120528C3 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:16:15 -0800 (PST) +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + (Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla@fulvetta.riseup.net) + with ESMTPSA id C9682436 +Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) + (SquirrelMail authenticated user odinn.cyberguerrilla) + by fulvetta.riseup.net with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:16:14 -0800 +Message-ID: <9eaa4a24adabaebcd34a724926fdcea8.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net> +In-Reply-To: <op.w9q6jdsayldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> +References: <20140106120338.GA14918@savin> + <op.w9c5o7vgyldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> + <20140110102037.GB25749@savin> + <op.w9kkxcityldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> + <CABsx9T2G=yqSUGr0+Ju5-z9P++uS20AwLC+c3DnFMHtcQjQK6w@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgTz0TaGhym_35V3N2-vHVzU9BeuV8q+QJjwh5bg77FEZg@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP0huBWqgvQik9Yc26Tu4CwR0VSXcfC+qfzsZqvoU4VJGA@mail.gmail.com> + <20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> + <CANEZrP1KAVhi_-cxCYe0rR9LUSYJ8MyW8=6eSJZ65FeY5ZJNuQ@mail.gmail.com> + <20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> + <CANAnSg0tH_bK_19rsRRHOeZgrGYeWMhW89fXPyS4DQGmS4r_7A@mail.gmail.com> + <CALimQCXgc0eXeOcqFGUaCpSF7gKEe87KzvLqHZwUysV3WyjjGw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgShChAQryfUOBp60jB-zxn2tH986fu1HfT+LsNdBYnoYg@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJHLa0P5r2+kxy7w8G=h=TAhdk1jUoW5UOiv-euo47uQY0u9ZA@mail.gmail.com> + <op.w9q6jdsayldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> +Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:16:14 -0800 +From: "Odinn Cyberguerrilla" <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> +To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 +X-Priority: 3 (Normal) +Importance: Normal +X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mx1 +X-Virus-Status: Clean +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain + 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay + lines +X-Headers-End: 1W3bZF-0002Ij-OQ +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:16:24 -0000 + +Yes. Good idea(s). + +> Might I propose "reusable address". +> +> I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so +> encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'. +> +> It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. = +The +> feature is only useful if/when broadly adopted. +> +> I think it meets all the criteria required: +> +> - Communication between parties is a single message from the payee, +> which may be public +> - Multiple payments to the same address are not publicly linkable on +> the +> blockchain +> - The payee has explicitly designated they expect to receive more th= +an +> one payment at that address +> - Payer can publicly prove they made a payment to the reusable addre= +ss +> by revealing a secret +> +> I have high hopes for this feature. The war *against* address reuse may +> soon be a distant memory. +> +> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> +> wrote: +>> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intende= +d +>> use/direction. +>> +>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +>> wrote: +>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport +>>> <bendavenport@gmail.com> wrote: +>>>> But may I suggest we consider changing the name "stealth address" to +>>>> something more neutral? +>>> +>>> ACK. Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a +>>> little cringe-worthy. +>>> +>>> "Private address" would be fine if not for confusion with private-key= +s. +>>> +>>> "Static address" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve +>>> awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more +>>> one-use-ness)--------------------------------------------------------= +---------------------- +> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. +> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For +> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. +> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. +> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D119420431&iu=3D/4140/os= +tg.clktrk_______________________________________________ +> Bitcoin-development mailing list +> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development +> + + + + |