diff options
| author | Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc> | 2015-09-09 20:51:37 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-09-09 18:51:39 +0000 |
| commit | 6dfd690766961783c6f23562e94924faa9eebce4 (patch) | |
| tree | 7036f5538bf366d5b5495dd34e90447511e1c3bd /0f/c33452f7b698a61055217be6732c9be8079023 | |
| parent | 39564ad44464450ae1674276ee7c1f693ae969d1 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-6dfd690766961783c6f23562e94924faa9eebce4.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-6dfd690766961783c6f23562e94924faa9eebce4.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yet another blocklimit proposal / compromise
Diffstat (limited to '0f/c33452f7b698a61055217be6732c9be8079023')
| -rw-r--r-- | 0f/c33452f7b698a61055217be6732c9be8079023 | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/0f/c33452f7b698a61055217be6732c9be8079023 b/0f/c33452f7b698a61055217be6732c9be8079023 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bf661cdd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/0f/c33452f7b698a61055217be6732c9be8079023 @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB53ACD + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:51:39 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com + [209.85.212.173]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA29D3F2 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:51:38 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so2132404wic.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date + :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; + bh=hWogaa5GvZ+UQXofLIrQJZss3Y0suOX6Ir/oOWF/J2Y=; + b=GlLN8H2XimCo/F0E+fwUtcypGPJrAv92zWXB1ThBv2y+vzjSQ+xrl4MgY+72OMgyip + wpj2FFl9tfCrlU7i10jSWRSikWVmvoUuubrlnM2p4x8e/Xp0xabp4NhRDC+y/N26JbB4 + O5wflpzbZQBIkoencqBVgTN8zjcAslDa/TqhYysLgtYo8XYAtU+tP44xa/gmnV18r3DS + H1eXXxw8PyYuAd9sKCZaJVLT7z37kEZW2VUgbMcyTnRJokcKgqG7c+dz0pSeswf0KxQ4 + tsA1jOLj+uMz6JEBIvf1ZggPpk99H9/G0H3EqwJrM2zWEyzzm1htevb0uPXuFpvXHNQu + nPtg== +X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcaL9+iqNab0+SRKU/BLxBmerAFEPnsBeWGqlnbeJRSw+c7mI/HUp5NrWLcGmfKU7EQlh/ +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.194.238.39 with SMTP id vh7mr58792097wjc.109.1441824697356; + Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAAUq485B5AoTpRBzf0=KFm-k58Zoz+ns-Y7BXc3JwG87VsDo+g@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAAUq485B5AoTpRBzf0=KFm-k58Zoz+ns-Y7BXc3JwG87VsDo+g@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:51:37 +0200 +Message-ID: <CABm2gDrsnVEkcq2CPwK4fcJpwHj6ouTSRnk4U2bMBOPvjRuD_w@mail.gmail.com> +From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc> +To: Marcel Jamin <marcel@jamin.net> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yet another blocklimit proposal / compromise +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:51:39 -0000 + +--089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> +> I propose to: +> +> a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without +driving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently +running a fullnode probably have some capacity left. + +What about the risk of further increasing mining centralization? + +--089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 + +<p dir="ltr"><br> +On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br> +><br> +> I propose to:<br> +><br> +> a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without driving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently running a fullnode probably have some capacity left.</p> +<p dir="ltr">What about the risk of further increasing mining centralization?<br> +</p> + +--089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d-- + |