Re: Futurism not so hard after all?

From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Sun Dec 12 1999 - 07:14:13 MST


In a message dated 12/11/99 12:23:34 AM Central Standard Time,
d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au writes:

> Okay, here's such an article I just had in the national Australian
> newspaper, in a bland series called `Chronicles of the Future'. I
> deliberately avoided Singularities and other Joe Six-pack repellents,
> putting in just enough to twist his brain a little. Is this the kind of
> thing you abhor, Robin?

I thought it was brilliant: You got in all of the elements we've identified
so far that seem set to remake the world next century and made it just
inviting enough to not frighten folks. I do disagree with your "no-work"
projection: Any AI that can truly replace a human will BE a human for all
intents and purposes and won't work for free. Overall, though, I think we
should be proud that such a piece will get such wide distribution in Oz.

      Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
      Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
      http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
        "We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
        enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
       question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
                                           -- Desmond Morris



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:06:03 MST