From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Thu Dec 02 1999 - 19:00:19 MST
On Wednesday, December 01, 1999 7:29 PM Michael M. Butler
butler@comp-lib.org wrote:
> It's also worthy of note that all known species of cephs have *really*
> short lifespans by human lights.
> Senescence/death appear to be plugged in to sexual maturity in cephs, more
> so than even, say, mustelids.
>
> So now, posit the ceph uplift requires extending their lifespan. If that
> were done to the germline and
> it got out into the world's ceph population somehow, what would the impact
> be? With, or without, changing
> their go-for-broke reproduction strategies (e.g., planktonic larvae in
some
> species)?
That would depend on whether they could interbreed with non-uplifted members
of their species. I think it might be best to make for some sort of species
isolation such that the uplifted member of a species is reproductively
separate from the nonuplifted members. However, in practice, I do not know
if anything we can do would make that possible given the ways octopodes have
sex.
More to think about!
BTW, in the previous debate on this, one of the things I liked about
octopodes was their speed of reproduction and the number of offspring. If,
e.g., uplifting were to be made illegal, this would be a way to present the
powers that be with a fait accompli -- i.e., an uplifted species that would
be hard for them to isolate or root out. This is, of course, assuming that
the uplifted species is not something that we would want to root out.:)
Cheers!
Daniel Ust
http://mars.superlink.net/neptune/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:55 MST