From: Replicant00@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 29 1999 - 00:35:41 MDT
In a message dated 10/28/1999 6:47:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
rob@hbinternet.co.uk writes:
<<
The subjectivity is not the problem. The unworkable, over complicated
rulebook where one central guideline will do is the problem.
I am not quite sure who's rulebook you are talking about.. I don;t remember
there being mention of one in this thread.
>Also, I don't
care if my thoughts are considered condescending or seen as heresy or
whatever, this isn't relevant to whether or not the idea is workable.>>
Condescension and heresy aren't the same thing at all, why would you group
them as one?
>It is simplistic to think you have found the one solution, however
brilliant
>it is.
The one solution? Your words, not mine.....and it's not that brilliant
either. It's blatantly obvious.
You said something once which started this whole thing... what was it, all
the morals we need to know are not to harm anyone? Something along those
lines.
>> But people never bother to think (except
people such as those on this list).... >>
Again, which people are you talking about? What I mean by condescending is
exemplified above. It isn't heretical, just disrespectful.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:38 MST