From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Mon Oct 18 1999 - 03:32:14 MDT
"Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com> writes:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 TriStateF@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Suppressing sex drive has been associated with suppressing other human
> > drives?
>
> Drives generally run on different feedback loops so in most cases
> I would say they are independent. I would say that thirst is
> distinct from hunger is distinct from sex. That's because the
> "detectors" for when you are in short supply of one should
> involve different biochemical mechanisms.
I agree. My view is that the drives are mostly independent, but
compete for behavioural expression - usually you cannot fulfill them
all at the same time. So if you remove one drive, the others will get
more "space" to act in.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:32 MST