Re: Making people passive NOT!

From: Cynthia (cyn386@flash.net)
Date: Thu Oct 07 1999 - 10:57:54 MDT


David Lubkin wrote:

> Cynthia wrote:
>
> >And who can object to making people smarter???
>
> I can. If you can deal with the psychological pathologies at the same time,
> fine. But I don't want a smarter violent psychopath.

Of course. I was proposing to increase their mental capabilities to the point where
they had the ability to sympathize with others. This would have the side effect of
increasing their IQ. This is much better than getting rid of all their violent
tendencies and making sheep out of them. In order to be a normal human being, some
violent tendencies are required.

> Are they amoral? Are they indifferent or blind to other people's feelings?
> Do they derive pleasure from causing pain? Are they dramatically
> self-destructive? There are all sorts of pathologies I'd rather not have walking
> the streets.

Exactly, we need to get rid of these mental deficiencies.

> Are there any current or imminent techniques or technologies for treating them
> that come anywhere near passing conventional scientific standards (like
> double-blind studies) other than drugging them into a continual stupor?

Most of these types of people manage to get their act together in their 30's.
Pointing to the idea that these people are simply slow to mature.

I do have one rather practical idea. Do something to temporarily disable their legs,
so that they will be confined to a wheel chair until they are 30. This would be much
cheaper and less damaging to them, then sending them to prison. They would still be
in society, but unable to do very much damage to other people.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:26 MST