Re: >If True, consider the impact

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Wed Oct 06 1999 - 09:53:33 MDT


"Joseph 1" <joseph1@neosapiens.org> writes:

> > Speed Of Light May Not Be Constant, Physicist Suggests
> ...
> > nothing has, or can, travel faster. John Moffat of the physics department
> > disagrees - light once travelled much faster than it does today,
> > he believes.
>
> This canard has been around for years. It's an old Creationist doohickey to
> try to explain the "Young Earth Theory" (that the Earth is actually only
> 6000+ years old). I don't know if Moffat is a Creationist for sure, but I
> wouldn't be at all surprised if he was getting a stipend from the Institute
> of Creation Science.

Be careful here, the idea that physical "constants" can change over
time has been studied on and off in cosmology for a long time with no
connection to creationism. Eddington and Dirac have done some work in
this field. However, all evidence so far are more consistent with
constancy than change in these constants.

As for Moffat, he has publications in a variety of astronomical
fields; I cannot vouch for their quality, but he is definitely not an
ignorant creationist. One of his papers involves stochastic gravity
and a self-organized critical cosmology with no singularities -
doesn't sound like something the creationists would like (among other
things, it is independent of initial conditions - you don't even need
a fine tuning of the world to get it).

Also, you cannot change the speed of light itself, what has to change
is a dimensionless parameter like the fine structure constant; it
makes no real sense to say that c has increased with 1 km/s, since
kilometers and seconds are based on c.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:26 MST