From: Jeff Davis (jdavis@socketscience.com)
Date: Fri Oct 01 1999 - 12:09:22 MDT
hal@finney.org
Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:03:21 -0700
writes:
>It's amazing to think of the ribosome (which translates RNA into proteins)
as a molecular
>machine with many moving parts. Probably there are other cellular
components which will turn
>out the same way. This should give additional credibility to nanotech (if
it needs any more). Our
>cells are full of tiny, active machines, not just passive chemicals that
bump together.
When we think of machines we often see gears, shafts, connecting links,
piping, wires, valves, switches, etc. The molecular machine of the cell
is, in contrast, a long, folded, linear array of amino acids, so its
mechanistic nature is almost certainly to be of a uniquely different, and
to our experience novel, character. When one moves beyond the false mental
image of this "machine" as a static lump--and image fostered by the
inherently static nature of pictures and other visual depictions in common
use--and tries to envision the dynamic operation of this machine, a rich
suite of possibilities presents itself. The configuration of the linear
array is potentially immensly multivariate. It (does or can) wiggle throb,
twist, stretch, and slide over itself, all the while creating highly
dynamic regions adjacent to, between, and beneath the moving strands, as
well around and between the larger dynamically polymorphic clumps.
I fully expect, as the truth is revealed, to be dazzeled by the fractal
elegance and complexity and beauty of natures art.
Best, Jeff Davis
"Everything's hard till you know how to do it."
Ray Charles
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:22 MST