Re: Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things
From: k_aegis@mindspring.com
Date: Tue Sep 28 1999 - 09:39:49 MDT
- Next message: k_aegis@mindspring.com: "Re: Crocker's Rules (WAS: Women, fire...)"
- Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Maybe in reply to: phil osborn: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Queen Muse writes:
>I am gonna be forced off the list - not by sexism, but by >boredom!!!!!!!
Sexism is boring, isn't it? Very dreary and sad. I'm amazed that people put so much energy into perpetuating it and defending it. Still, understanding the world we live in can be an important first step in overcoming our limitations within that world. Not easy, not fun, but important. I've never been convinced that technology will just whisk all of that away, otherwise it would have happened by now.
Kathryn Aegis
- Next message: k_aegis@mindspring.com: "Re: Crocker's Rules (WAS: Women, fire...)"
- Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Maybe in reply to: phil osborn: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Women, fire, and dangerous things"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:18 MST