From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Wed Sep 15 1999 - 01:53:53 MDT
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote:
> This just says "Thud". To use a Hofstadterian analogy, it's like:
>
> abc->abd::xyz->?
>
> Hofstadter presents a number of answers, including:
>
> xya
> xyd
> wyz (the best)
>
> and one, which Hofstadter says "definitely presents a very loud 'Thud!'",
>
> dyz
>
Eliezer,
I realize that you are most likely doing an astute analysis
or synopsis here. I also realize that I haven't read the
background material required to make the correlations.
If *I* haven't read it, just taking a number out of a hat, that
means perhaps 7 out of 10 people on the list haven't read it.
For productive discussions, you simply *must* ground your
comments in reference points that people can read and say
oh, xyd = Hofstadter pg 201 in book XXX YYY.
Sub-disciplines of science have their own unique language
and one must constantly wrestle with the tendencies to
fall back on those languages or explain understandings or
details in a way that discourages general access.
Science must be understandable by the average individual
to be useful and you must provide pointers to make that
understanding as simple as possible.
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:09 MST