From: Ian Goddard (Ian@goddard.net)
Date: Mon Sep 13 1999 - 04:02:21 MDT
At 10:29 PM 9/11/99 -0700, Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
>> IAN: You could guarantee that destroying
>> the building and killing witnesses will
>> destroy the evidence of the aerial attack
>> on the first day and silence witnesses.
>
>It silences the *VICTIMS*, it does not silence
>the witnesses who participated in the actions!
IAN: Ever notice how more victims come
forward to report crimes than perpetrators
come forward to confess?! I'm not impressed
that perpetrators of mass murder are inclined
to rush forward to confess their crime, and
I expect the planners of such a crime are
also aware of the same. Perhaps one will
want to write a book and make a lot of
money so he can refurbish his prison cell,
but I also think most people don't like jail.
Also, the fact that an ex-CIA agent recently
came forward to report that the Delta Force
was firing at Mt Carmel and he's now hiding
after death threats to himself and his son
gives us a little hint about the forces at
play that can help ensure silence. I'm not
impressed that most people desire death
for themselves or their family members.
>But, you still haven't addressed my fundamental points
> (1) Why would the government create a conspiricy
> involving dozens or hundreds of individuals
> to commit mass murder?
IAN: I've already given some answers to that.
If we have videotape of someone committing a
crime, the question of why is academic. If
we have video of Smith killing Jones, Smith
wont get off if a motive isn't established.
As to your baseless assertion that the FLIR
may be faked. The FLIR came from the FBI and
the FBI claims the flashes in question are
sunlight reflections. I'm not impressed that
the FBI would doctor the FLIR in such a way
that frames themselves for mass murder since
expert analysis confirms that they are not
sunlight reflections but gun-muzzle flashes.
Here's another expert analysis of the flashes:
http://www.rolandresearch.com/SRGv1/B9-Report.htm
> (2) How would they hope to protect such an action
> from exposure?
IAN: Concealing and "losing" evidence and
other things that they've done and are doing.
Is this really so difficult to figure out???
I'm not impressed that crimes involving a
lot of people are impossible or that there's
an overwhelming tendency for those involved
in mass murder to rush forward to confess.
But even if I was, the bottom line is the
facts in the case, since someone could
confess to a crime that wasn't committed.
------------------------------------------------------------
GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm
____________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:08 MST