From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Thu Sep 09 1999 - 22:38:41 MDT
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Patrick Wilken wrote:
> VERDICT IS IN: BRAIN IS SERIAL IMAGE PROCESSOR
> By R. Colin Johnson EE Times (09/08/99, 10:48 a.m. EDT)
>
> http://www.eetimes.com/story/technology/advanced/OEG19990908S0001
>
[snip]
> For such diverse tasks it is clear that the brain does operate in
> parallel. But when it comes to tasks involving similar data items, the
> brain appears to time-division multiplex, that is, focus its attention
> on one object at a time so quickly that the conscious mind is not aware
> of it.
Oh, oh, I think this is Eliezer's, "unconscious congnition" raising
its ugly head.
[!!!DANGER EXTROPIANS DANGER!!! BAD MEME ALERT]
[Said in the voice of the Lost in Space Robot]
> "It's counterintuitive because it seems to our conscious mind
> that we are comparing objects simultaneously, but we now think that the
> brain's parallelism is similar to a computer's-that is, a computer has
> millions upon millions of simultaneously acting transistors, but at the
> functional level it is operating serially-one instruction at a time,"
> Luck said.
[more snip]
Sigh! This is what happens when you let a wet-matter biologist
comment on computer architectures. Luck's concept of computer
architectures died 5-10 years ago.
No discussion of Symmetric Multiprocessors (SMP) that have simultaneous
access to memory! No discussion of processors with multiple "execution
units" doing instructions simultaneously! No discussion of SIMD
(Single Instruction Multiple Data) or MIMD (Multiple Instruction Multiple
Data) architectures processing data streams simultaneously! No discussion
of architectures like the TERA that simultaneously stream dozens of
data elements in and out of memory and can do a context switch on each
instruction to operate on the data that happens to be available.
Good thing his email address isn't included. Hrummphhh!
Most importantly, all this work says is that there is serial consideration
of items in the visual field as subjects for limited analysis operation.
It would seem to be the analysis operation (something that requires a
yes/no decision by the conscious mind) that is the hurdle. Unfortunately,
it only pays lip service to a few of the many things the brain *can* do
simultaneously.
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:05 MST