From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Tue Sep 07 1999 - 10:56:56 MDT
In a message dated 09/07/1999 12:50:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
asa@nada.kth.se writes:
> Less young people = less capital invested in homemaking, schools and
> other activities involving the young and setting up families. A
> decreased population may have a hard time keeping the economy afloat,
> especially if a large percentage is retired. Robotization doesn't
> occur magically overnight.
You could be right. Or it may be that it takes less to keep a smaller
population afloat at a high standard of living. Look at Scandinavia?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:04 MST