From: Clint O'Dell (clintodell@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 03 1999 - 13:37:31 MDT
Robert Bradbury wrote:
>It would seem to require an isolated part of the mind that can produce
>random interrupts.
I wrote:
>You're right it would
I take that back! I had only 2 hours sleep that night and wasn't thinking
as straight as I should have been when replying to your post.
It would not require interrupts. Especially an "isolated" one. I don't
know where the Hell you came up with that conclusion.
All that is required is a near continuous input to produce these constant
thoughts. One thought leads to another, leads to another, leads to another,
etc... The body's sensory inputs are one of these types of input. Also
thoughts act as feedback. No that is not perpetual. The energy is coming
from the chemical reactions in the body.
Me goal here when I say this is not to offend you but to point out an
observation. I'm starting to doubt your understanding of neuroscience.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:01 MST