Re: >H RE: Present dangers to transhumanism

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Wed Sep 01 1999 - 23:27:37 MDT


In a message dated 09/01/1999 4:04:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
sentience@pobox.com writes:

> I suppose in theory I shouldn't worry about going nuts if I find out
> that there are no ultimate goals, because then my going nuts wouldn't
> intrinsically be worse than not going nuts. In practice, I do worry
> about it, partially because it sheds light on the "foundations of the
> foundations", partially because it helps me locate residual desires,
> partially because I'm still not sure I have the right formulation of
> anything, and partially because it's tied up with cosmological problems
> like the Great Filter Paradox.

Silly Conjecture, by a silly conjecturist: There ain't no Great Filter. What
appears to be Fermi's paradox is simply that outer space is kinda big; and
that real space-faring Super-Civilizations/Personalities/Brains are very,
very, Spread Out. That radio waves just don't propagate quite as well as we
think they should, and that where we are physically at-from the supposed
other chaps- is something massive that jams radio signals and interupts
neutrino streams. A galactic nucleus would do; and just maybe we are the only
sentients in the dear, old, Milky Way?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:59 MST