From: Sun Leegba Love (kyberlove@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 01 1999 - 16:42:47 MDT
At some current density,
I believe you setup a magnetic field that disrupts Acceptance of
timeinfusedSpace
natural space materializes as property
KON ZEN THINK superconductivity. a problem
of what thoughts create
with the material FORMsimply staying together
the highest-field magnets HAVETRANS would presumably apply to KERNEL
STRUCTURE-INSIDE as well as you keep SPIRITHEALINGSCIENCE you increasing the
field density.
I believe you setup timeSPACE ANTIMatter LAW Energy #1
HAVETRANS would presumably apply a magnetic field that disrupts material
properties
timeinfusedSpace
Acceptance of natural space
?
of what thoughts create
SLL
>From: "Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com>
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.com
>To: extropians@extropy.com
>Subject: Re: antimatter....info?
>Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, CountZero wrote:
>
> >
> > We don't have a shortage of energy, one way or another we can
> > generate/capture enough for most purposes that are currently relevant,
> > the problem is lack of a sufficiently energy dense storage media (btw,
> > the jet pack of the '60s used H2O2).
>
>Actually I would argue that the problem you can't controllably release
>the energy. Hydrogen bombs are very dense energy storage devices. :-)
>But if you compare the mass of a tokomak to the mass of the fuel
>in it, the device weighs much more than the fuel.
>
>In the area of storage density, I believe the work at NASA to
>create mono-atomic hydrogen frozen in He and use it as a
>rocket fuel, could "effectively" be very dense. But you
>are going to need a very interesting "plant" to create
>the fuel. It isn't something you could use to power your
>laptop.
>
> >
> > If my understanding of super conductivity is correct, a super conducting
> > coil should be able to store an arbitrarily large amount of energy.
> > Is this correct?
> >
>I don't believe so. At some current density, I believe you
>setup a magnetic field that disrupts material properties that
>allow superconductivity. I think the highest-field magnets
>have a problem with the material simply staying together, so
>this problem would presumably apply to superconductors as well
>as you keep increasing the field density.
>
>One of the physics gurus may want to comment more.
>
>Robert
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:59 MST