Re: knowledge doubling

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Sun Aug 29 1999 - 07:15:42 MDT


On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Watkins wrote:

> I've often come across statements such as "the quantity of human =
> knowledge is doubling every x years". However, x seems to vary from 2 to =
> 15, and nobody ever says where they get their figures from! Does anyone =
> have any pointers to information on the subject? (Or, for that matter, =
> any idea what the doubling period might be?)
>

I know, I've seen them too and they never quote a source.
I suspect that librarians at a major university would know since
they have to deal with the journal flow and they keep saying that
it is rapidly increasing. A few years ago there was just "Nature",
now there is Nature, Nature Genetics, Nature Biotechnology,
Nature Neuroscience and Nature Medicine (perhaps more).

You can probably measure it 4 ways:
 a) Journal Article (page?) count
 b) Patent count
 c) PhD's awarded/Professor/Scientist count
 d) Research Budget $$$ (Government + Private industry)

There is no way those numbers are going to all agree.
In the Medical field you can get a pretty good estiamte by going
to PubMed (@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), reading the help topic on how
to do a query by year, and then simply enter a query with
no contraints except the year. Repeat that for each year
from 1966 to now.

In the process of writing this I remembered that I had actually
done this at one point (duh, I think my brain is too full...).

At any rate, pulling up the Excel sheet, and fitting the two
curves to it gets:
  Power Curve: y = 5E-05x^2.1719, R^22 = 0.9817
  Exponential Curve: y = 31685e^7E-05x, R^2 = 0.9805
Where x = year and y = # publications in Medline.

If we have a statistician in the group, they may be able to translate
that into "doubling time". The doubling time to go from 200,000
to 400,000 articles per year was 18 years. Just eyeballing
it on a graph with linear scales, the growth looks pretty linear.

I suspect that biomedical publications closely matches
the budget. I've got some of the NIH budget figures and have
been meaning to plug them in and see how closely publication
count matches $$ in, but haven't had time to do it yet.
If true given the recent big boost in NIH funding, we should get a
big publication boost in a year or two.

Robert



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:56 MST