Re: gimps schmimps

From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sun Aug 15 1999 - 22:23:48 MDT


On Sunday, August 15, 1999 4:37 PM Patrick Wilken
<patrickw@cs.monash.edu.au> wrote:
> >If anyone could figure out a quick way to factor
> >the product of two large primes, not only would national security
> >be at stake but also the world's banking system. With such
> >strong factoring, one could read any encoded message.
> >Mathematicians, however, are not losing much sleep worrying
> >that someone will discover such a shortcut. spike
>
> But presumably only until we develop reasonable quantum computing. How
long
> is that going to take? <20years? Are their any encryption schemes that
will
> hold up to a QCs assault?

I suspect that encryption will keep up. It's history has been one of new
encryption systems arising as new encryption breaking systems arise. Kind
of like an arms race -- in the Dawkins sense. I think quantum computing and
AIs will create both new making and breaking systems -- not eliminate
encryption entirely just make a lot of current stuff obsolete.

Also, one need not make a scheme that is unbreakable, just unbreakable for a
certain length of time. For example, if I am now able to decode all German
and Japanese coded message from World War Two, this does not help me much --
unless I'm an historian.:)

Cheers!

Daniel Ust
http://mars.superlink.net/neptune/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:46 MST