From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Aug 09 1999 - 09:48:50 MDT
At 03:04 AM 8/08/99 -0700, Paul wrote:
>I am aware of the visual 'result' of saccadic scanning - and it is distinctly
>different. Saccadic scanning looks exactly the same as double vision by
>crossing your eyes. The 'aura' effect
>caused by the method I've used, results in a wide variety of colors
independent
>of the color of the object.
Oh. Sorry if I jumped the gun there with an over-simplification. The only
experience I have in this line which involves *colors* is caused by the
involuntary gaze flicker which can produce a liminal surround of
*complementary* hue to the object looked at (an after-image, in fact). A
red pencil will have a green `aura'. If your method is more technicolor
than that, can you describe how to induce it?
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:41 MST