RE: Links to scientific studies of homeopathy

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Thu Aug 05 1999 - 18:55:11 MDT


David Lubkin writes:

> It is essential in science to *first* get the facts and then decide what they mean.
> The many double-blind studies (and other evidence) says there are facts. If
> they don't fit our theories, then our theories are inadequate.

Strange, the homeo studies I've heard of so far have all been
nonreproducible. The structured water hypothesis has been dropped
because there is simply no evidence for a statistically significant
effect at all. Of course everybody cites their favourite studies, but
really, to the mainstream the high-potencies homeo is snake oil.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:40 MST