From: Theta 8008 (ubergoo@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 02 1999 - 16:46:06 MDT
8008
Here is a copy of the "Anarchy(tm)" rant that I mentioned:
Telesis Foundation for Applied Memetics
http://telesis.veindance.com
CHAOSMOS: The Product is The Process
http://www.angelfire.com/biz2/ubergoo/chaosmos.html
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
attached mail follows:
8008 OK, let's talk about that. I have been much influenced by Frederick Mann's concept of building freedom as opposed to fighting for freedom. Most of his work, therefore, is in the area of building alternative institutions and structures for use now. These alternative institutions and structures make up a REAL free market. Now, to complement this, it would be wonderful if structures and dynamics for local co-operation were established. The knowledge and means exist if people will use them and DO it. It does not seem to be happening though. When I began the Telesis project, I considered myself to be an Anarchist and began forwarding "stories" from the A-Infos anarchist news to this mailing list. Over time, the news seemed to become increasingly irrelevant to anything; and gradually I came to understand that the mainstream ANARCHY(TM) movement that exists today is not at all revolutionary and is largely ANTI-revolutionary. Another concept from Frederick Mann is that there are levels of freedom with their own specific "consciousness" and related activities. "Protest" (as a "consciousness" and activity) is actually a lower level. Today's mainstream ANARCHY(TM) is a movement, philosophy and "consciousness" of protest. Libertarianism, on the other hand, is rooted in the concept of the Sovereign Individual. This principle DOES appear in early Anarchist writings, but it is rarely discussed and certainly not EXPRESSED in today's ANARCHY(TM) which is fanatically ANTI-INDIVIDUALIST. An Anarchist(tm) is not a Sovereign Individual. No, s/he is completely identified with the Mass, the "working class", the oppressed, the victims. Struggle and protest are the "doingness" that come from this "beingness" (identity). J18: "Man, we were all there...and we held up SIGNS!!!" Which is about all that an Anarchist(tm) can do. S/He has identified with powerlessness to the extent of making "POWER" itself a "devil" of hir ideology. Lao Tzu observed long ago that social ills result from the powerlessness of the people. However, the Anarchist(tm) has turned this around. Rather than empowering themselves and other people, they seek to exorcize "POWER" from the universe. The Anarchist(tm) is NOT a Sovereign Individual and so can not BUILD FREEDOM. Now, I am not saying that protest does not have a place or serve a purpose, but consider: What did J18 REALLY accomplish? A lot of energy went into it worldwide. Would it not have been better if that energy had gone into forming The sort of mutual aid societies and their connected community centers that Hakim Bey discussed in his essay THE TONG or into local ACUR (alternative currency) projects that would REALLY help to break the money monopoly? Zero ..I'd like to be under the sea... http://is.dal.ca/~ceph/TCP/index.html _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:22 MST