Re: Improving [...] Nanogirl?

From: Damien Broderick (damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri Jun 18 1999 - 10:23:03 MDT


At 01:51 PM 16/06/99 -0700, Gina wrote:

> when I
>first join the list, even I had some self defending to do as sometimes can
>happen. (Remember that Damien?)

Erm, all I recall (after a quick search) is some to-and-fro over your early
habit of re-posting the entirety of whatever you were responding to, the
kind of carelessness that Joe Dees has specialized in more recently.
Drawing yr attention to this (unintentional) breach of netiquette wasn't
meant as a personal affront, or not quite. :)

BTW, I appreciate the urls. And call me perverse, but I much prefer the
*un*consolidated posts - that way I can archive the ones I want and trash
the rest.

And what are these saucy pictures that everyone is slavering about? All
I've found in a quick scamper across yr site is a sort of 1930s
cool-but-smouldering ink wash portrait.

Damien Broderick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:13 MST