From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Tue Jun 08 1999 - 05:39:17 MDT
"Raymond G. Van De Walker" <rgvandewalker@juno.com> writes:
> >> Just an ignorant question here. Do any of you have specific ideas
> >> for preventing an interspecific war of extermination between
> >> transhumans of different species, or between humans and transhumans?
> >
> >Rationality. Why would species A want to get rid of species B (costly
> >and dangerous), when they can instead trade or cooperate and both get
> >the benefits?
> > and the likeliehood of having very different
> >ecological niches. As long as the number or impact of irrational
> >agents is sufficiently low and there are no "dominant technologies"
> >that give the wielder total dominance over any non-wielder, this seems
> >to be stable.
> Sounds good, but humans adapt every niche in the ecosystem to their own
> use. Humans _don't_ partition niches. Neither would transhumans, or
> other
> _intelligent_ nonhumans. By simple Malthusian principles, wars of
> exterimination are inevitable between intelligent species. Ecologists
> have already establisehd that when two species 'share' a niche, in the
> long term they either partition it, or one goes extinct.
Suppose tomorrow a transhuman species with a green skin (but no other
differences) appeared. Would this cause a war of extermination (other
than the usual cases of prejudice and intolerance against people with
unusual appearance)? It would certainly share our ecological niche and
be another species - but it looks rather implausible that it would
cause a war of extermination just because it had a distinctive
appearance and inability to breed with us.
The problem here is that the assumption of humans adapt ecological
niches for their own use wrecks the Malthusian and ecological
assumptions, they no longer apply. Two intelligent species can work
quite well within the same ecological niches (do you care if it is a
human or transhuman who helps you plan your vacation?). There is no
economical reason for them to try to remove all individuals of the
other species. In fact, there might be strong economical incentives
for specialization instead (such as the law of comparative
advantage). The main reason for the different behavior is that humans
are not just trying to maximize the number of offspring they have, but
rather have many other memetic goals.
Of course there may be other reasons for conflict, but economically it
looks more like increased diversity is a good incentive for creating
transhumans and encouraging them to add their abilities to the
economy. It makes a win-win situation, where the ecological niche is
indeed dominated by a single species "generalized human", composed of
physically and perhaps mentally different subspecies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:03 MST