From: Charlie Stross (charlie@antipope.org)
Date: Mon Jun 07 1999 - 06:12:54 MDT
On Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 08:54:50PM -0700, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
> I think if we restrict the discussion to technologically advanced
> weapons (depleted uranium vs buckshot, particle beam vs. Uzi) and
> keep the politics out of it things would be perfectly appropriate for
> this list.
Cool.
I have occasionally wondered about the idea of caesium-core bullets.
Do we have any ammunition experts on the list?
(Reason for caesium: (1) it's denser than lead, and (2) it has an
interesting tendency to react with water.)
-- Charlie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:01 MST