Re: Good Top-Down Systems WAS Re: property Rights]

From: Gina Miller (nanogirl@halcyon.com)
Date: Fri Jun 04 1999 - 21:02:42 MDT

• Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: [GUNS] a comment"
• Previous message: Eugene Leitl: "Reminder: the transhumantech list"
• Maybe in reply to: Raymond G. Van De Walker: "Good Top-Down Systems WAS Re: property Rights]"
• Next in thread: Rick: "Re: Guns [was Re: property Rights]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> >PS- What are some good "top-down" phenomena? That is, what are some
>>systems
>>that work well in a "top-down" way?

I don't know if this was a serious question or not, but:
We started with hitting rocks together to use as tools, sticks for fire, and
eventually the standard manufacturing outfits that caused the industrial
revolution.Technology so far has worked that way, down to the micro, getting
smaller and smaller, down to the nanoscale.
Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
Nanotechnology Industries
Web:
http://www.nanoindustries.com
E-mail:
nanogirl@halcyon.com
Alternate E-mail
echoz@hotmail.com
"Nanotechnology: solutions for the future."

• Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: [GUNS] a comment"
• Previous message: Eugene Leitl: "Reminder: the transhumantech list"
• Maybe in reply to: Raymond G. Van De Walker: "Good Top-Down Systems WAS Re: property Rights]"
• Next in thread: Rick: "Re: Guns [was Re: property Rights]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:59 MST