more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Wed Jun 02 1999 - 15:51:39 MDT

Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: Anybody have any problem with LEF"
Previous message: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Approximating Hypothetical Beowulfs"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Maybe reply: Al Villalobos: "RE: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Maybe reply: Al Villalobos: "RE: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I have been away from the list for over two years. I returned to see what was
the latest Extropian topic in nano, technology, creativity and other
futuristic realms, Yet this same topic - which clearly has two trajectories,
is being re-hashed over and over as nauseum. It was ongoing when I left. Just
like abortion, religion or taxation.. it continues ...wanking on and off and
on and off. Nothing changes.
Suggestion:
Why not spend time thinking up new and fresh debates?

Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: Anybody have any problem with LEF"
Previous message: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Approximating Hypothetical Beowulfs"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Maybe reply: Al Villalobos: "RE: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Maybe reply: Al Villalobos: "RE: more guns and guns and guns and guns and guns and guns"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:56 MST