Re: Submolecular nanotech [WAS: Goals]

From: Gina Miller (nanogirl@halcyon.com)
Date: Thu May 27 1999 - 14:35:52 MDT


How much of an immune system would we really need in the long run of
nanotech? We would be way beyond the imagined extent of cellular repair.
Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
Nanotechnology Industries
Web:
http://www.nanoindustries.com
E-mail:
nanogirl@halcyon.com
Alternate E-mail
echoz@hotmail.com
"Nanotechnology: solutions for the future."
-

>"O'Regan, Emlyn" <Emlyn.ORegan@actew.com.au> writes:
>
>
>Nanoimmune systems are of course a very good idea, and I would guess
>medical nanotech will be one of the first major applications (depite
>all the restrictions, medical technology is a very profitable business
>and the transfer from basic research to application is fairly well
>streamlined). Most likely they will be in place before the ufog, even
>if they are crude. However, dealing with debris in the lungs and food
>is already done by macrophages and their intestinal counterparts; my
>guess it is a good idea to design the ufog to manageable by them
>rather than assuming everybody will have a nanoimmune system.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:50 MST