Re: Submolecular nanotech

From: Gina Miller (echoz@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu May 20 1999 - 00:39:29 MDT

• Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "singularities for kiddies"
• Maybe in reply to: Ron Kean: "Submolecular nanotech"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Follow the illusion Damien!

>>
> >>I agree 11%
>
> >OOPPPSSS I swear I meant 100 %
>
>Aw, shit, ruin the illusion of sly wit, why doncha.
>
>Actually I assumed this was the preliminary miniaturised percentage.
>
>Damien Broderick
>
>

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

• Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "singularities for kiddies"
• Maybe in reply to: Ron Kean: "Submolecular nanotech"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:46 MST