From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Tue May 18 1999 - 10:06:41 MDT
Gina Miller writes:
> This step forward, the ability to push atoms around, is the basic first step
> towards building molecular machines (nanotechnology). The problem left now,
> is how do we bond these together, to build? Moving down to the subatomic
You can't push atoms around, unless they are noble gases absorbed to a
cold surface. If you had a naked atom (radical) trying to bond it to
something would be the least of your worries. In fact this is the
reason you can't work with single atoms (with the possible exclusion
of shooting cold radicals down a buckytube upon a surface), but have
to use reactive moieties. They are either an analogon of a monomer,
or get reactivated in a cycle after deposition. The abstract deposited
species may indeed be an atom, but this doesn't mean you are pushing
atoms around.
> level, may or may not be the next step. Top down or to bottoms up, should we
> skip? Why not keep delving into all aspects? I think there is a lot more to
> learn at the atomic level, aside from abandoning it.
Yes, there is much to learn: http://crit.org/critmail/sci_nano.88-94/2279.html
'gene
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:45 MST