Re: Becoming Immortal? (was: The Promise of Cryonics (was Re: ethical problem?))

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Sat Apr 24 1999 - 14:21:44 MDT


Karsten Bänder <Karsten.Baender@ivm.de> writes:

> Well, this is indeed a very desirable future, yet, I think that it is
> impossible to to become immortal in the classic way. The human body cells -
> at least some of them - aren't made for perpetual function. Life can be
> extended to an age of about 120 years, with the average lifespan ranging
> somewhere around the nineties, but then, eventually, some important cells
> will simply stop replicating. All you can do then is to hope that they will
> still be working, though at a slowly decaying rate.

What about replacing them with younger cells? You could either store
cells while you are young, or make stem cells differentiate into the
right kind of tissues. This won't solve all problems (the brain
remains), but it lessens the impact.

And there are always plastics, metals and silicon :-)

> It might, however, be possible to clone your body with a "blank" brain to an
> age of around 18 and then transmit all that which makes up your immortal
> "soul" (your experience, wisdom etc.) into this blank brain.

Tricky, if you try to do it with a biological brain. You need to make
it identical down to the neural level, and that is of equivalent
complexity to scanning the original brain in the first case.

> This would also
> reapir problems caused by diseases such as Alzheimer, which do not affect
> the cells, but the communication ability of the brain cells.

Huh? As far as I know, Alzheimer kills off brain cells. Alzheimer
brains are notiseably shrunk.

> I'm not a medic, but as I did understand from various conversations, the
> cells which make up your veins (among others) will be affected by this aging
> problem. This means that you could not simply transplant your brain as the
> aging of the brain is largely caused by the gradual malfunction of the
> arterial system.

This is the most common cause of brain-related deaths if we exclude
Alzheimers. Either you get a bleeding or a thrombosis, in both cases
parts of the brain die. But the brain ages naturally too, for example
receptor numbers go down over time and the conduction speed
decreases. This has to be fixed.

> I do also understand that it would be nearly impossible to
> repair this by nanobots an genetic engineering.

Hmm, aren't you making somewhat contradictory assumptions here? First
you assume the technology to keep people very healthy up to an
advanced age. Then you assume technology able to not just grow a clone
body (in itself not that complex, but making it grow up well is likely
hard) but to transfer the mind either through copying neurally or
transplanting the brain and connecting all the neurons in the spinal
cord and senses in the right way. Then you assume that this fairly
advanced technology can't fix bad arterial walls even given
nanotechnology. The problem isn't bad assumptions, it is that you seem
to be mixing the technological levels a lot.

Fixing arterioscleroris with nanotechnology is likely possible, an
almost classic idea for swimming nanobots. And I seem to recall
research into arterial gene therapy today.

> Or perhaps the "soul" would be uploaded into a psychometric device which
> allows you to exist outside of the physical body - transcending into another
> state of living, and then download into a new body if you want - much in the
> way as discussed before.

This is what is commonly called "uploading" on this list. It is
regularly debated every third month, when a huge debate breaks out
about whether the upload really is you :-)

My guess is that uploading is the hardest technology of the above, but
the most important in the long run - we cannot rely on these bodies
forever. In the meantime, life a healthful and enjoyable life, make
sure to get good medical treatment, and as you age hope medical
advances keep up and/or get a cryosuspension contract. My guess is
that we will see enough stuff the next decades to make "upload heaven"
a possibility for most of us.

(I look forward to be able to read this list while fully digital)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST