Re: Mars: Go now, or wait?

From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Sat Apr 10 1999 - 10:14:57 MDT


In a message dated 99-04-01 01:56:39 EST, spike66@ibm.net (Spike Jones) wrote:

> 1. Who believes we should wait for nanotech to start a Mars colony?
> 2. Who believes we should wait for bio-suspension?
> 3. Who believes the point is to *have* an exocolony before these
> other things come online?
> 4. Who believes we have the technology now and should start now,
> even if it requires great discomfort and sacrifice on the part of
> the first colonist(s)?

As a long-time space enthusiast <http://users.aol.com/gburch1/space.html>, my
thinking about "Big Projects" in space development has undergone significant
evolution over the years. Thirty years ago I certainly would have pushed for
an early Apollo-style project for a manned Mars mission, and a
government-funded Mars base as soon thereafter as possible. Now I'm very,
very opposed to such an idea, because I'm sure it would do more harm than
good, in the long run.

The transhumanist vision has been key in transforming my feelings about space
development in one way more than any other: I now feel that patience is a
PERSONAL virtue in my desire to reach the stars. Every year the technology
for space development gets better and better and the cost for achieving any
particular goal off-earth drops more and more. If I have a realistic
expectation of a significantly lengthened life span, then it makes sense to
be patient. Now, does this mean that I've postponed my expectations until
after some magical nanotechnology breakthrough? No. Instead, I see a
positive feedback with technologies that don't require such a complete
breakthrough that puts the solar system into humanity's grasp in a realistic
time-frame.

"Early nanotech", meaning the kinds of material science we can expect without
a full-blown Drextech assembler within the next 20-30 years, coupled with a
maturing MEMs technology, should lower the strength-to-weight ratio of
spacecraft so significantly before 2030 that we can realistically expect
major advances in near-earth economic development in that time frame.
Establishing a large base on Luna and a largely self-sufficient small Mars
colony by 2040 or so seems highly possible to me now. And the fact that I
will be 83 in 2040 doesn't seem so bad any more . . .

        Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
     Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
        http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
                         "Civilization is protest against nature;
                  progress requires us to take control of evolution."
                                      -- Thomas Huxley



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:31 MST