From: Ian Goddard (Ian@Goddard.net)
Date: Sat Mar 27 1999 - 11:29:59 MST
CONTRAIL ANALYSIS II
If you thought the last photos were extreme...
see: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/contral2.htm
The contrail case continues with pages proposing
that contrails are poison spray sprouting up like
spring grass. Poison-spray proponents proclaim that
contrail persistence, or nonevaporation, is evidence
that a contrail is not condensation but a toxic spray.
That claim errs, for contrail persistence is a common
phenomenon dependant upon relative humidity, and thus
contrail persistence is not evidence of poison spray.
Quoting the conclusion of Contrail Analysis II:
CONCLUSION: both my previous contrail analysis and
this follow-up analysis present photographic proof
that contrails will do the same things that the
natural clouds around them will do; which in turn
proves that what contrails do -- whether they will
evaporate quickly or slowly expand into one of many
patterns -- is a function of the natural atmospheric
conditions in which the contrail was formed. This is
not a new revelation, just as contrail persistence
is neither a mysterious phenomenon nor evidence of
spraying. http://www.erols.com/igoddard/contral2.htm
**********************************************************
Visit Ian Williams Goddard -----> http://Ian.Goddard.net
__________________________________________________________
"The more restrictions and prohibitions in the world,
the poorer people get." Lao Tzu (Tao Te Ching)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:24 MST