Re: why do we need 30 women?

From: den Otter (neosapient@geocities.com)
Date: Sat Mar 27 1999 - 04:09:23 MST


----------
> From: Spike Jones <spike66@ibm.net>

> > Lee Daniel Crocker wrote: ... -you can create [a Mars colony]
> > from scratch in a century or two starting with, say, 30
> > or 40 young, healthy, genetically diverse women and
> > a big dewar of sperm....
>
> Altho it presents some extreme difficulties, could we
> not start a Mars society with a single woman and
> a bunch of ethnically diverse frozen embryos? Could
> not the single crosser of interplanetary space have
> her birth canal surgically enlarged before launch
> in order to facilitate giving birth by herself after self
> implanting an embryo some time after it starts looking
> like she will survive on the surface? It appears to me
> that all the mission requirements scale to the size of the
> astronaut. Our best bet might be a single very small
> woman, perhaps one with no legs, whose weight
> might be 30 kilos or less. spike

Surely we'll have artificial wombs a decade or two into the future,
(those would be a good idea anyway), so there will be no need
for such things. Besides, biological bodies are *not* the wave
of the future. There'll likely never be a large-scale, multi-generation
colonization of Mars or any other planet (save, maybe, the moon)
by humans. Even the most conservative estimates place the
Singularity at no more than a century from now. If the human
race survives that, everyone with any serious pioneering ambitions
will upload into some artificial form that's better adapted for space
travel.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:24 MST