From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@mercury.colossus.net)
Date: Fri Feb 26 1999 - 10:46:10 MST
> There is also a good piece there entitle: "The Eternal Now" by
> Jaron Lanier. <URL: http://www.forbes.com/asap/99/0222/072.htm>. I
> completely agree with his declaration: "Information processing will
> never spawn human consciousness in computers."
>
> I really like what he says about "anticonsciousness smart
> alecks":
> A small but robust cadre of intellectual shock
> artists these days is paid to assert that people aren't
> real. Every year one sees more books, mislabeled as
> popular science, aimed at furthering the claim that the
> reader is an illusion: The Astonishing Hypothesis;
> Consciousness Explained; The User Illusion; How the
> Mind Works. On and on, the formula repeats itself. An
> arrogant, overreaching title is essential, as is an
> overview of recent brain research to create an
> atmosphere of scientific authority. But the science is
> peripheral to the boast that the author has attained a
> superior vantage point from which to decimate the
> reader's tender sense of self.
I had just the opposite reaction: what tentative respect I may have
had for Mr. Lanier was lost with this silly paragraph. I suspect
that Mr. Lanier simply can't understand Dennett, so he invents this
defense to excuse his ignorance.
The sense in which these authors claim that "we" don't exist is
exactly the same sense in which a rainbow doesn't exist: it's not
a thing "out there" that two people can observe and agree upon;
it is an illusion in which my experience differs from yours (since
my rainbow is centered on me, yours on you). This is a simple,
explainable fact of science that any high-schooler should know.
Many people, presumably including Mr. Lanier, hold the assumption,
perhaps unstated, that the "mind" or "self" is something like a
cloud and not a rainbow; i.e., some "thing" that exists "out there"
rather than an effect of our perception. This is a quite simple
thing to understand, and a reasonable thing for authors like
Dennett to try to explain. Lanier's straw man parody and attack
is about as silly as someone saying "What do you mean a rainbow
doesn't exist--look, there it is!" Nothing but clever prose to
mask ignorance of facts.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:09 MST