Re: Extropianism & Theology

From: Timothy Bates (tbates@karri.bhs.mq.edu.au)
Date: Thu Feb 25 1999 - 22:04:04 MST


Aaron Davidson said
> Since myself and many others do not seem to feel this instinct, I think it
> must be more of a conditioned factor.

Well try the same logic out in this sentence
"Since i myself do not have brown eyes, I think it must be a conditioned
factor"

I think that God-believing is a heritable neural module present in the minds
of the great majority of human brains.

A module which evolved around 150,000 years ago and which served the
valuable purpose of enabling teleological reasoning (reasoning about
purposes).

I think myself, with no evidence whatsoever, that about 3,000-5,000 years
ago, either a mutant variant entered the population or perhaps merely chance
selective breeding in a small tribe (of Ionic Greeks for instance) created
an emergenic phenotype which lacks this neural module.

Those of us on this list who believe in the kind of extropy that I have been
discussing lack this module.

I think also that the majority of principles which I espouse follow very
directly from simply being incapable of explaining events in terms of
"spiritual" happenings, being constrained instead to operate solely in the
materialist reductionism space.

I think that we learn Occam's Razor. We learn the fragile culture of
science. But we are born either able or unable to use immaterial events as
explanations.

tim



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:09 MST