Re: TWA 800 in the top ten net-hoaxes

From: Ian Goddard (Ian@Goddard.net)
Date: Thu Feb 18 1999 - 21:42:07 MST


At 08:08 PM 2/18/99 -0700, Keith M. Elis wrote:

>Conspiracy theories are great self-replicators. And it looks like the
>TWA Flight 800 cover-up theory has had a better-than-average life
>expectancy. CNET rates it one of the 10 best net hoaxes of all time. I
>was hoping they'd give Ian Goddard some credit for keeping it alive...
>
>http://www.cnet.com/Content/Reports/Trends/Nethoaxes/ss07.html

  IAN: Keep in mind that just because leaders say
  X is a hoax does not mean that X is a hoax. To
  know if X is a hoax requires more than faith
  in authorities, hard to imagine as that may be.

  We can know, for example, that the web page you
  forwarded commits a hoax because it presented no
  evidence of a hoax it purports to exist. It even
  notes that the source of Salinger's document was
  Richard Russell, a retired United Airlines pilot
  living in Florida. That is not evidence that it
  was a hoax. The proof that it was not a hoax is
  the fact that Richard Russell was not making it
  up. He acquired the FAA radar tape from the same
  person connected to the investigation he acquired
  the intelligence of the Navy activities under FL800.

  That the Russell report is a hoax is a proven hoax.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:05 MST