Re: Y2K silliness

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Feb 14 1999 - 14:50:55 MST


Y-to-K Date Change Project Status

"Our staff has completed the 18 months of work on time and on budget.

We have gone through every line of code in every program in every
system.

We have analyzed all databases, all data files, including backups and
historic archives, and modified all data to reflect the change.

We are proud to report that we have completed the "Y-to-K" date change
mission, and have now implemented all changes to all programs and all
data to reflect your new standards:

Januark, Februark, March, April, Mak, June, Julk, August, September,
October, November, December

As well as:

Sundak, Mondak, Tuesdak, Wednesdak, Thursdak, Fridak, Saturdak

I trust that this is satisfactory, because to be honest, none of this Y
to K problem has made any sense to me. But I understand it is a global
problem, and our team is glad to help in any way possible.

And what does the year 2000 have to do with it? Speaking of which,
what do you think we ought to do next year when the two digit year rolls
over from 99 to 00? We'll await your direction."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:03 MST