From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Tue Jan 26 1999 - 15:55:55 MST
In a message dated 1/25/99 11:40:07 PM Central Standard Time, spike66@ibm.net
writes:
> a fusion weapon all the way down to two atoms of plutonium 238. each one
has
> a 50% chance of sitting there acting like any other nonradioactive atom in
> any
> given 88 year period, and putting the two next to each other doesnt change
> anything. if one decays, the other one will most probably not be
impressed.
> nanotech will not have nuclear as an option for power. spike
A (possible) quibble...from a truck driver.
Aren't you referring to fission? It seems to me that fusion might actually
scale down. After all...the minimium ingredients are two hydrogen atoms.
EvMick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:56 MST