Re: disparaging Gould

From: mark@unicorn.com
Date: Tue Jan 26 1999 - 04:25:21 MST

• Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Nanotech Arms Race"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "disparaging Gould"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "disparaging Gould"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: disparaging Gould"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Re: disparaging Gould"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Damien Broderick [damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au] wrote:
>I've seen this cited a few times as though it proved something. Do we have
>any reason to suppose Paul Krugman (a biologist I'm unfamiliar with) knows
>what he's talking about in this respect?

There's a fairly long article disparaging Gould at:

http://humanitas.ucsb.edu/users/steen/Debate/CEP_Gould.html

with comments from biologists I have heard of. Personally I've never met
a biologist who had anything much good to say about him, but maybe they're
wrong.

    Mark

• Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Nanotech Arms Race"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "disparaging Gould"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "disparaging Gould"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: disparaging Gould"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Re: disparaging Gould"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:56 MST