From: Damien Broderick (damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Wed Jan 20 1999 - 06:02:40 MST
At 07:38 PM 1/19/99 -0000, Damien Sullivan wrote:
>We are biological beings; there is a level of physical privation
>which has been the common fate of agricultural humans, is still common in
much
>of the world, but which has been left far behind by most of the First World.
>There is a difference between not having a mansion and not having enough to
>eat. The urgency of growth to get basic food, shelter, and education
>is less than the urgency of getting the next round of goods.
Yes - but... I wonder about the outliers. I don't know anyone who's
hyper-rich, but it looks from the outside like a kind of opiate addiction
that sometimes actually *overwhelms* some of the obvious self-maintenance
routines (think of Howard Hughes).
And there's another boggle - I don't quite know how to factor it in - due
to each of us currently having only one body to experience stuff through.
Murdoch pere and fils have both been seen lately on TV doing fairly
dangerous things on boats in rough water, playing dangerously with the
other rich kids. No doubt this is partly advertising and partly Alpha
behaviour, but I imagine it's just a hell of a lot of fun and even when you
could be making another trillion dollars at yr desk sometimes you'd `rather
be sailing'.
>Wait, I thought they wanted mansions. You can't have most people having
>higher and higher ideas of what constitutes affluence but also have them go
>fishing once the gov't provides them with $8000 income.
Indeed.
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:53 MST