Re: life extension vs. natural law

From: Gina Miller (echoz@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 19 1999 - 15:07:27 MST


You said:
>What is the support for this? As far as I can remember from Hayflick's
>_How and Why We Age_ and other readings, wear and tear doesn't appear
>to be the main factor in current aging, and people more look at
>genetic and systemic factors.

Are we not to believe that if the gene that predisposes the timeline of
our life, that there are no other factors? That the elelments
surrounding us have no effect on encouraging the aging process. To alter
ourselves internally, still leaves the environment? We will still have
to take the products of natural processes into consideration (water,
air, stone and clay). We breathe and move in these molecular structures
daily. We would in a sense be a foreign matter living in a typical and
complex world.
Gina Miller

Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
E-mail at:
echoz@hotmail
Web Page at:
http://www.delphi.com/nanogirl

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:53 MST