Re: A moral zero-point?

From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@together.net)
Date: Tue Jan 19 1999 - 07:39:50 MST


Dan Fabulich wrote:

> Darin Sunley wrote:
> >Can ethics even exist without multiple agents?
> >If not then we've found a natural zero point in "ethics-space":
> >The empty set describing the possible ethical interactions of
> >non-interacting agents.
> >
> >Non-interaction is certainly A zero point. Of one axis at least.
>
> Some deontologists would argue that it is unethical to have bad will
> towards someone, even if you never come in contact with them in your entire
> life and affect them in no way at all. Obviously, in this case you could
> have two people who would never interact, but who would nonetheless each
> have ethical obligations regarding the other.
>

If you are aware of another person, there is interaction. Maybe not personal
one on one interaction, but it is still interaction. Much like a certain CEO of
a monopoly coporation most of us are shareholders in. Most of us have never met
him, but his unethical 'personal' actions in the office have impacted us
all....

Mike Lorrey



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:52 MST